logo
All About Symbian - Reviews
Nav (0)

Nokia 6220 Classic

Nokia's latest attempt to fit a quart into a pint pot proves a qualified success....

6220 Classic

At only 66cc and 90g, the 6220 Classic is one of Nokia's very smallest S60 phones, but don't let the diminutive size fool you, for this has virtually all the functionality and spec of the flagship N95. What's interesting is to spot where compromises have had to be made in order to perform this miniaturised magic trick. 

At least, that's the most interesting way to approach the 6220 Classic for tech-heads and power users - the man in the street will see this as a free Nokia with 5mp /Xenon-flash camera on a £15 a month contract and that's the guise in which it will sell by the bucketload. It might even appear on pay-as-you-go by the end of 2008 - who knows? SIM-free, it is available now for around £260, but this should fall towards, or even below, £200 once the launch-price-effect wears off. Very impressive - compare this to the N95's launch price of £500.

But, taking the geek's point of view - yours and mine - let's examine this tiny S60 phone in detail. The review unit had a rattle-prone keypad surround, but let's be generous and assume that this is because it wasn't a full retail device (it came white-boxed but with full box contents). Shiny black (and fingerprint-attracting) plastic, so much in vogue these days, provides most of the front surface and feels cheap, if I'm honest. If I didn't already know what was inside the 6220, I'd dismiss it as a bottom of the line Series 40 feature phone. Yet the prominent (in contour, not in size) S60 apps key gives a clue to what the device can do.

There's a microUSB jack on the bottom, plus a charging socket and, unusually, a 2.5mm enhanced audio jack. It's surprising to see a 2.5mm jack on a mass market phone, but hey, the 6220 Classic comes with compatible stereo headset and TV/Hi-Fi out leads, so the user's got all they need to get going. This is the first phone I've seen with 2.5mm TV out, by the way - it's a pity the E71 and E90 didn't have the extra electronics for this lead to work....

6220 Classic

The left side has microSD card slot (tethered), plus a blue-jewelled navigation shortcut key, shown below - a great touch. This launches Nokia Maps, as you might expect, but can be customised in Settings. The 6220 Classic's right has volume up/down (/zoom in/out etc) and an annoyingly prominent camera shutter button. It's part protected by an accompanying plastic protrusion, but I'd still much rather have semi-sunken keys, as on the N95.

6220 Classic

But it's round the back where the real appeal of the Nokia 6220 Classic lies. Ignore the flimsy rear battery cover - just look. There's a Carl Zeiss-lensed, protected 5megapixel camera with Xenon flash. Wow.

6220 Classic

The results from it match up, more or less, to those from the likes of the N82, with the Xenon flash being every bit as bright as that in its much more expensive stablemate. For casual users there's no question that this will replace a basic digital camera.

6220 Classic sample photo, click to enlarge 6220 Classic sample photo, click to enlarge

Click each to enlarge to full size or download (watch out for browser re-sizing etc). On the left a sunlit close-up - a little over zealous edge enhancement, perhaps! On the right, a Xenon-lit shot in near total darkness

Here's a direct 1:1 close-up (i.e. this is only a tiny fraction of the whole picture area) from a photo taken on the N95 (left) and 6220 Classic (right):

N95 vs 6220

The N95's photo is better, but it's hard to say whether this is due to better optics or sensor or simply more mature photo-processing algorithms - the typical 6220 Classic user would be pushed to spot anything at all wrong. And hopefully future 6220 firmwares will tweak photo quality etc.

As with the N82 and N95 classic, sliding the mechanical lens protector across kick starts the Camera application, although the interface seems simplified a bit for this mass market phone, with all the fiddly exposure, ISO, sharpness (etc.) options removed. Probably just as well. Rafe says that this is because the 'full' camera application is Nseries-specific, the older Nseries camera app (which this is) has been passed back for inclusion in the baseline S60. 

Screenshot  Screenshot

What's been added is optional geotagging of your photos. We saw this for the first time in the black N82 and it works just as well here, with intelligent algorithms handling short-lived GPS lock dropouts. Video recording is at the (usually Nseries) standard of VGA by 30 frames per second and, again, brings 2008 specification hardware slap into everyman's lap.

As a 'candybar', the 6220 Classic has to make do with smaller keypad and smaller screen, but, as with the N82, I felt that the designers skimped a little. Here there's a 2.2" display and there's easily room for a 2.4" (the N82 had 2.4" when there was room for a 2.6"). The fractions of an inch sound trivial, but look here at the real world difference between the 6220 Classic and the similarly-specced N95 8GB:

6220 Classic

With S60 3rd Edition Feature Pack 2 having smaller fonts in places than previous editions, you have to have reasonably good eyesight to use the 6220 Classic comfortably. Luckily, the target demographic will be much younger folk than I and even 2.2" shouldn't be a problem. The display is bright and clear, as we've come to expect from most recent Nokias.

The main key cluster and d-pad are top notch but the numeric keypad is flush and only the '5' key has indents - this makes it harder than it should be to find your way around the keypad and it's also not helped by the corner keys (* and #) being harder to hit because of their extreme positioning. Still, again, these sort of compromises come with the candybar form factor at this size.

6220 Classic

Removing the flimsy back cover reveals the well known BP-5M battery. At 900mAh, it's on the small side, but then there's only a small screen to keep powered up and no Wi-Fi to soak up electrons with.

6220 Classic

Although much of the S60 phone spec is set in stone these days (3.5G data, Assisted GPS, oodles of free RAM, 100MB plus free flash storage), the 6220 Classic misses one staple out by not having Wi-Fi. This may shave a fraction off the bill of materials for the phone, but size issues and aerial configuration may also play a role. Most buyers won't miss it because they won't be looking for it - but hey, I was a little disappointed. This is the first S60 phone for well over a year that hasn't had Wi-Fi and it was a bit of a shock to have to do everything over the cell network for once! Given the growth of 3G coverage in most markets over the last few years this is less of an issue than it would once have been. However, some applications types do suffer, at least a little, from the absence of Wi-Fi - notable among these is Nokia's Music Store, with its multi-megabyte downloads.

More minor omissions include an accelerometer and a 'multimedia' key - but as a distinct non-fan of the latter, I think its omission is actually a good thing, not bad! And, with technology moving on apace, there are several features here that even the mighty N95 didn't have. USB 2 transfer speeds, for example, meaning that I regularly got up to 10MB per second to and from the 6220 Classic's disks. Great, really great for loading up media for playback later, or for archiving captured photos and videos.

Most of the other additions come as part of S60 3rd Edition Feature Pack 2 (FP2). This is one of the first devices to use this (I encountered a few instabilities and doubtless there's a firmware upgrade already in testing) and I was largely impressed. I loved the labelling of the context-sensitive centre key (d-pad in) throughout and I loved the shortcut to 'Show open apps' in all menus throughout the 6220 Classic. With more multitasking, easier access is needed, of course, so the 'open apps' list is now a compact grid and you get to see all your running applications without having to scroll - providing you can recognise them from just their icons.

Screenshot  Screenshot  Screenshot

The most obvious FP2 addition, of course, is 'Theme effects' (transitions), accessed from the usual Themes menu rather than from Display settings, as might have been more logical. These involve animating everything - so, for example, screens fade out/in and appear to recede or grow. Even moving the highlight from app icon to icon involves the highlight 'sliding'. The most dramatic transition is when switching from something in portrait mode to something that has to run in landscape mode, in which case the entire display shrinks, rotates and then grows again. Most experienced users (including me) enjoy the novelty for at about five... minutes and then spend another five searching for how to turn the effects off, since they get annoying very quickly and tend to slow down the UI. The transitions are there, I suspect, because the Apple iPhone 'has them'. New S60 users will keep them turned on, doubtless - mainly, I suspect, to impress people down the pub.

Screenshot  Screenshot

In terms of the 6220 Classic's software package, S60 has been maturing nicely for some time and the Nseries innovations and exclusives are here in force in a FP2 'numbered' phone. Podcasting, Share Online, Print Online, Nokia Music Store, Widsets, are all present in the firmware, with apps like Sports Tracker ready for grabbing via Download! The number of applications shipped with an S60 device has never been higher, yet Nokia do seem to largely be coping by dint of reorganising the shortcut icons and using nested folders to hide programs a lot of people will rarely use.

In case you were wondering, an N-Gage client is absent, although I thishank it would make a lot of sense. I benchmarked the 6220 Classic using the processor-intensive game Oval Racer, and found games performance quite weak, although it's possible that this simply meant that optimisations in the game for previous OS versions weren't taking effect. Testing using playing back H.264 MP4 videos showed that the 6220 Classic is certainly capable at throwing reasonable number of pixels around the screen.

There are extras here, of course. Marble Cannon is a really nice arcade puzzler and works beautifully in portrait mode, while there's the bought-in Mobile Dictionary, providing English help and also translations for up to two extra languages for free. Interestingly, Nokia's (now standard) email text-to-speech routines even work happily  inside Mobile Dictionary and it's fun to point the software at tricky French or German words and see how the phone fares. Not bad, as it turns out, even though the voice is always a little 'dalek'.

Screenshot  Screenshot  Screenshot

Most of the S60 application suite is as expected, but Gallery has had a rework for FP2 and is faster and slicker, integrating the photo editing from the Nseries phones (but not the latter's carousel operation). Quickoffice is the viewing version, of course, and there are newcomers like Active Notes, also now standard across Nokia's range. File manager has had an overhaul for FP2 as well, by the way - there will be more on FP2 from Rafe shortly, so I won't steal his thunder.

Screenshot  Screenshot  Screenshot

Nokia Maps is the new v2.0 version and fits really well with the form factor. Impressively, the 6220 Classic seems to come with a microSD card pre-loaded with your country's streets - though this of course might vary by region. Annoyingly, Maps 2.0 on the (unconfigured) review unit didn't seem to like my Vodafone connection and I wasn't able to try out voice navigation. The basic Internet link was fine though, as evidenced by being able to surf happily in Web in portrait or landscape mode.

Screenshot  Screenshot

There are still some FP2 buggettes to fix, it seems, with Maps hanging at one point and Web showing truncated text in its pop-up menu. In addition, some applications ignored the new FP2 'Destinations' groupings and offered up the old 'Access points' list. Gallery needed the phone to be power cycled in order to see some new videos I had loaded onto the memory card. Finally, Share Online didn't appear to have its back-end support in place yet, with 'no services available' [Rafe reports that Share Online is fine on his retail 6220 Classic).

Screenshot  Screenshot
I tried to find out which version of the Java app Yahoo Go was included, but the software wouldn't even load... Wierd.

Nokia seems to have gotten S60 down to a fine art in other ways. For some time now, users are offered an animated tutorial when they first power up a device - you now also get offered the chance to sign up to 'My Nokia' on the second power up - with the great backup/sync services offered here, Nokia are right to make people aware. Incidentally, the tutorial's been greatly expanded here, with new sections on geotagging, Share Online, and the other new apps and features.

Screenshot  Screenshot  Screenshot

Nokia Zine seems to be a new thing, pushed through Web bookmarks.
Interestingly, the free game was missing its download links - someone's not thrown the right switch yet at Nokia 8-)

Teething troubles apart, there's very little wrong with the Nokia 6220 Classic. The small 2.2" screen won't be to everyone's taste but it's still good enough for someone wanting a traditional 'candy bar' phone. The numeric keys could do with more physical differentiation (come back, the N82, all is forgiven!) and I lost count of the number of times I hit the 'C' key by mistake when going for the right function key. Yes, the phone is all plastic, and in places flimsy, but then this is building down to a price. The user in the High Street will simply see a 5mp-equipped, GPS/nav-equipped Nokia for no more per month than Motorola want for one of their latest RAZRs and will be blown away.

6220 Classic

So what if Rafe and Steve don't buy a 6220 Classic? That's two more in the shops for the rest of humanity.

Steve Litchfield, All About Symbian, 10 July 2008

PS. actually, Rafe has bought one, he'll explain why in a separate editorial shortly

 

See Also

Nokia 6220 Memory Cards

Published by Steve Litchfield at 13:55 UTC, July 9th 2008

Categories: Hardware
Platforms: S60 3rd Edition

News Discussion

Unregistered
Comment: Hey Steve, Samir here. I rang 3 up and they should be getting the 6220 Classic on both Pay As You Go and Pay Monthly quite soon so you might want to put an update on your review. They don't know exactly when they are getting it because obviously they have to sort out their own firmware for the phone with extra apps etc. I've got a 6120 Classic and I am definitely going to get the 6220 after reading your review! :)
Unregistered
Comment: Looks good. I think I can live with a smaller screen so I am going to go down to the High Street and have a look. If the 6220 feels significantly smaller and more pocketable than my N95, I am going to change.
ayush3090
Comment: gr8 review as always

n in India n82's cheaper than 6220...........so the only plus vd get is FP2 if v buy 6220, otherwise n82's anyday better in terms of screen, build quality, grafix accel., n obv better looks

but i also want to try out the new FP2, what would you suggest ?
Kazutoyo
Comment: If this phone had N-Gage support and a 3.5mm jack, then I would have bought it already.

I want something like the N82, but in a smaller package. N82 is too big for my taste, and don't like the keypad either.
bartmanekul
Comment: Its a very nice phone, but I might swap it for the E66 when it comes out.

Might be worth the sacrifice of cam (5mp to 3.2) for the build quality.

Dont suppose anyone knows if the 3.2 cams have macro mode?

I did want ASR as well, but neither phone has an accelerometer.

One thing - batterylife seems awful on my 6220 compared to my 6110. Even though the 6110 has a 650 battery, and the 6220 a 900.

I'll give it a few more charge cycles.
Bassey
Comment: This looks like the most impressive s60 phone I've ever seen. In fact, up that screen to 2.4" and it looks damn near perfect.

I don't think WiFi would add anything to the phone for the target market and is just a support, cost and battery headache so I think it's a good decision in this case.

Incidentally, does anyone know if Nokia Maps covers the offshore (British) Islands like the IOM, Jersey, Scottish Western Isles etc. ?
davesmith
Comment: Thinking of swapping my N95 for this, as I rarely use wifi. And love the small foam factor. I am getting fed up with having to charge up my N95-1 every day.
How does the battery life in the 6220 classic compare for a heav'ish user?
Unregistered
Comment: 6500 Slide has 2,5" tv-out as well.
Almost
Comment: The problem I see is pricing...

The n82/n95 has been out for a while now and therefore has plumented in price. For example you can get the n95 on contract for £20/month with 3.

The 6220 classic is £35 with o2.

Even if you buy simfree the n95/n82 can be had for about £150 - £200 and the 6220c will probably cost more initially.

6 months later maybe a different story but 6 months later we'll be looking at something else. I would rather have a n95/n82 than a 6220c.
slitchfield
Comment: That O2 price would make no sense. Paying over £500 on contract for something you can get SIM-free for £250? I'd expect to see this in the £15 to £20 a month bracket immediately.
bartmanekul
Comment: I have to say, I cant see this appearing on a £15 a month contract.

£20 possibly, but I reckon £25 at least.

Hope Im wrong!
Rafe
Comment: I think you may see it in the £20 area, but there'll probably be a small extra to pay (say £50)? Pricing is a big thing, but I would underline that it is currently at launch prices. The 6120 was similar in price at launch and can now be had for around £100 if you look carefully.

We've got more 6220 content coming in due course. It really is a remarkable phone.
moonshot
Comment: I bought the 6220c yesterday from phones 4u. £25 a month on the orange network. I am wondering if you are right and in a few weeks the handset will be free on a £15 a month contract. And yes o2 are taking the **** at £35 a month.

The back of my handset in a matt black (rather than the shiny black on the 61200 so no fingerprints this time. Key pad in not as good as the 6210, but is ok. I only got ONE game marble canyon.

A few applications I bought for my 6120 ie. chess genius and world mate don't work on the 6220 (I'm not sure if this is to do with screen size); and the free Nokia 'conversation' won't work either.

The 6120 is light and compact and was ideal for me. The 6220 is also light but does not seem as compact. I wonder if the N78 would have been a better buy at only 11grams more. That was also on offer for £25 a month.
bartmanekul
Comment: Im finding a lot of apps dont work. FP2 really isnt very backwards compatible.

But worldmate works, on mine at least. What version are you using?
Tzer2
Comment: [quote]In case you were wondering, an N-Gage client is absent, although I thishank it would make a lot of sense. I benchmarked the 6220 Classic using the processor-intensive game Oval Racer, and found games performance quite weak,[/quote]

The reference hardware for N-Gage is the N73, that's what the games are written for. The 6220 Classic is easily powerful enough to run all N-Gage games.

The whole point of N-Gage is to run on as many S60 phones as possible, not just the technically advanced ones, because userbase is the key thing for a gaming platform, it trumps all other factors. If you have a large and active userbase, then your gaming platform will be successful no matter what technology you use.

The only reasons the 6220 Classic wouldn't have N-Gage is because Nokia haven't finished the FP2 version of the client yet, it will take three months for any finished client to enter firmware, and even then Nokia may stupidly decide not to release the client for all the models they could.

I just don't understand where this idea comes from that technically advanced games systems are the most successful, because it just isn't true. Compare rival games systems from virtually any period, and it's almost always the technically INFERIOR system that triumphs: the Atari 2600, the NES, the PS2, the Nintendo Wii, the entire Game Boy series etc. It's probably because cheaper systems can be bought by more people, so their userbase tends to grow more quickly, which then attracts more third party support so the initial success snowballs.
Unregistered
Comment: "As with the N82 and N95 classic, sliding the mechanical lens protector across kick starts the Camera application, although the interface seems simplified a bit for this mass market phone, with all the fiddly exposure, ISO, sharpness (etc.) options removed. Probably just as well. Rafe says that this is because the 'full' camera application is Nseries-specific, the older Nseries camera app (which this is) has been passed back for inclusion in the baseline S60. "

The "fiddly" stuff are all present in the 6220c. Just go options-> customize toolbar. It wouldn't make sense to put a 5mp sensor and leave all settings to auto, correct? :D
Almost
Comment: Lets hope it does go down to £15 a month contract very soon otherwise it doesn't make much sense choosing this over their flagship n95 released 18 months ago (£20/month).

I think this is where Nokia has missed the boat. So many N95 and to some extent n82 users are looking for an upgrade and Nokia doesn't release anything new. You may think it's only for the tech savy who are interested but I'm not so sure. The n95 is a popular device and even people who don't know too much about technology will know if a phone is better than what they currently have. I think even this group don't find anything appealing for example the n96. This is why I'm thinking of going elsewhere such as the Samsung Omnia or HTC Touch Pro/Raphael. I'm not a fan of WinMo but will give it a bash as they seem to be the ones moving forward. Nokia on the other hand have stagnated and sitting on their laurels. Why couldn't Nokia realease a true successor to the n95 and stay way ahead of the market? e.g. optical zoom, better optics, higher MP, widescreen / higher resolution just to name a few. What's wrong with selling bucket loads to the tech savy or for those seeking upgrades?

Nokia phones of late has been the same phone/features repackaged in a different casing.
Unregistered
Comment: ""So what if Rafe and Steve don't buy a 6220 Classic? That's two more in the shops for the rest of humanity.""

Thought you guys got all your phones & software for free ;-)
bartmanekul
Comment: [quote=Almost;383777]Lets hope it does go down to £15 a month contract very soon otherwise it doesn't make much sense choosing this over their flagship n95 released 18 months ago (£20/month).

I think this is where Nokia has missed the boat. So many N95 and to some extent n82 users are looking for an upgrade and Nokia doesn't release anything new. You may think it's only for the tech savy who are interested but I'm not so sure. The n95 is a popular device and even people who don't know too much about technology will know if a phone is better than what they currently have. I think even this group don't find anything appealing for example the n96. This is why I'm thinking of going elsewhere such as the Samsung Omnia or HTC Touch Pro/Raphael. I'm not a fan of WinMo but will give it a bash as they seem to be the ones moving forward. Nokia on the other hand have stagnated and sitting on their laurels. Why couldn't Nokia realease a true successor to the n95 and stay way ahead of the market? e.g. optical zoom, better optics, higher MP, widescreen / higher resolution just to name a few. What's wrong with selling bucket loads to the tech savy or for those seeking upgrades?

Nokia phones of late has been the same phone/features repackaged in a different casing.[/quote]

I agree to an extent, but the N95 in both versions is a big beast of a phone. I know quite a few who are wanting the same thing, in a smaller package.

I know of even more people that keep saying 'If only the 6220 had wifi'.

Personally, I think they should have done a version with the same form factor, but bigger screen (as Steve said it would fit) and wifi, and upped the cost accordingly. Call it the 6220 classic 'i'. Call it the the 6320. Either way, a lot of N95 users would have swapped.

And that the 6220 should have had an accelerometer, if need be sacrificing the TV out. ASR on the 6220 would get used a heck of a lot more than TV out I bet.

Myself, Im trying to get hold of a 6210N, and E66 to compare, since Im not convinced by the build quality of the 6220.
Rafe
Comment: [quote=Unregistered;383776]The "fiddly" stuff are all present in the 6220c. Just go options-> customize toolbar. It wouldn't make sense to put a 5mp sensor and leave all settings to auto, correct? :D[/quote]

Nice spot - and thanks for the posting it here :)

[quote=Almost;383777]Lets hope it does go down to £15 a month contract very soon otherwise it doesn't make much sense choosing this over their flagship n95 released 18 months ago (£20/month).

I think this is where Nokia has missed the boat. So many N95 and to some extent n82 users are looking for an upgrade and Nokia doesn't release anything new. You may think it's only for the tech savy who are interested but I'm not so sure. The n95 is a popular device and even people who don't know too much about technology will know if a phone is better than what they currently have. I think even this group don't find anything appealing for example the n96. This is why I'm thinking of going elsewhere such as the Samsung Omnia or HTC Touch Pro/Raphael. I'm not a fan of WinMo but will give it a bash as they seem to be the ones moving forward. Nokia on the other hand have stagnated and sitting on their laurels. Why couldn't Nokia realease a true successor to the n95 and stay way ahead of the market? e.g. optical zoom, better optics, higher MP, widescreen / higher resolution just to name a few. What's wrong with selling bucket loads to the tech savy or for those seeking upgrades?

Nokia phones of late has been the same phone/features repackaged in a different casing.[/quote]

I think there'll be upgrade options from Nokia before too long. The N82 has only been out 7 months or so at most so I suspect people will be waiting a little longer to upgrade. N95 people - yeah fair enough.

[quote=Unregistered;383780]""So what if Rafe and Steve don't buy a 6220 Classic? That's two more in the shops for the rest of humanity.""

Thought you guys got all your phones & software for free ;-)[/quote]

Actually, despite what Steve wrote, I have bought myself an 6220 because I think it is a great phone and wanted to spend more time with it. We'll be using the one I bought to do more features over the next few months. If there's specific areas you want us to look at please let us know.

BTW for the majority of reviews we do these days I (well AAS) buys the phone in order to get it in a timely manner, although sometimes we do get loaned phones by PR (as such its quite unusual to get a free phone despite what people might think!).
Hardeep1singh
Comment: [quote]Personally, I think they should have done a version with the same form factor, but bigger screen (as Steve said it would fit) and wifi, and upped the cost accordingly. Call it the 6220 classic 'i'. Call it the the 6320. Either way, a lot of N95 users would have swapped.[/quote]

Nokia doesn't want N95ers to get 6220, 6220 is for the mass market, to break away people frustrated with their motorolas, shamesungs and pony bricksons. Nokia would bring more candy for N95ers (which, ofcourse, would cost a lot more money too) like the upcoming N96. :D
bartmanekul
Comment: True enough, I suppose we all think about what would best suit us.

The functionality of an N series, with the build quality of an E series, with the form factor of a 6xxx model....
PekkaR
Comment: Before potential users get to see the phone and price tag and become impressed, operators and retailers are buying the handsets from Nokia and setting the prices according to what they think people will pay. I really hope nobody (realistically, "as few people as possible") gives them money until the pricing comes down.
friedbrains
Comment: ATM, it is as expensive as the N82... so if you are buying a phone today, might want to look at the Black N82 1st...

wait a month, and this will be really cheap, specially when N96 is out!
SmartA$$
Comment: I had this phone delivered on Monday, it was an upgrade on O2.

I really liked the size of the phone, the screen (though a little small for me) is really lovely, bright & clear. I also found the menu to be fast and intuitive. The camera was great too, loved the xenon flash.

However, I was really disappointed with the quality of the phone. I know the phone is built to a budget but for me I didn't feel like it would last 12 months. I know the phone tested in the review was not the final version but the one I had came direct from an operator. The sides of the phone creaked around the bottom third of the phone, around the kepad and the camera button. The back was also of disappointing quality, the battery cover didn't seem like it would last long if you regularily swap SIM's.

My 6220 is going back to O2, I know the phone is cheap and I don't mind a plasticky phone if its cheap. But I don't want a phone that is likely to crack on a small fall or in my pocket. I reckon it would take my 18 month old son about 10minutes to pull this phone apart.

My advice would be to get the N82 or N95 8GB if quality is important to you.

56 Comments / Post New Comment

Main Navigation

» Home (1)
» News (2)
» Reviews (3)  
» Features (4)
» Media (5)
» Forums M | Full (6)
» Top (9)

Advert

Find Jobs in Austin Now!

mobile.allaboutsymbian.com