logo
All About Symbian - News
Nav (0)

Motorola set to use Windows Mobile and Android

Yesterday, in a third quarter earnings call, Motorola's CEO, Sanjay Jha, said that they would be streamlining their OS strategy to concentrate on three platforms: P2K (low end and feature phones), Android (consumer smartphones) and Windows Mobile (business phones). Motorola will no longer use its own LinuxJava (MOTOMAGX) or the Symbian UIQ platform. It also appears that several UIQ phones that are currently in development, which would have hit the market next year, will be abandoned. Read on for more.

Motorola's third quarter net loses were $397 million and its market share has continued to slide. It is now in fourth position for market share with around 7.7% of the market compared to second place and 20% just 2 years ago.

The abandonment of Symbian UIQ is not surprising given that the advent of Symbian Foundation. However Motorola choosing Android over the Symbian Foundaion may raise a few eyebrows. It may be a question of timing, Android is available now, whereas the first release of the Symbian Foundation will not take place until H1 2009; moreover that release will be dominated by Nokia technology. It is likely that a lack of willingness, on the part of US based management, to work with Nokia and its partners in the Symbian Foundation is a contributory factor. In the end it was a choice between working with Nokia and working with a combination of Microsoft and Google. In both instances Motorola would have to rationalise taking a secondary role in directing the course of software strategy.

Anguished business politics have long been a part of Motorola's strategy decisions. Its platform strategy has a more complex history than any other handset manufacturer.

Several UIQ phones that Motorola had under development will likely be cancelled. UIQ's last hurrah will not see the light of day after all. Motorola's investment in UIQ, which seemed like it had a great deal of potential a year ago, is another waste of both financial resources and opportunity.

The abandonment of its own LinuxJava platform (MOTOMAGX) is, in many ways, far more serious. It was originally envisioned as a serious competitor for the likes of S60. Motorola have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in the platform over the last five years and to abandon it altogether is a damning indictment of Motorola's ability to deliver software projects and carry out hardware integration with Linux based phones.

Jha stated that a 3G phone using Android would be out by 2009 and mass market handsets would follow by 2010. This seems like an ambitious time table given the lack of pre-integration in the Android platform. Motorola do not have a good track record in implementing new platforms in a timely fashion. Motorola will also have to stand out from other Android handsets (from HTC and others) by differentiating in software and services, an area where is has had little success in recent years.

Windows Mobile is a sensible choice given Motorola existing expertise, its US brand strength and Windows Mobile's success in the enterprise market in the US.

Motorola is also effectively retreating to the US and a few key Asian markets. For the next two years it seems to have little intention to mount a serious challenge in the European market.

These announcements could be considered Motorola's third attempt to reinvent itself and at this point there is no real indicator as to why this attempt will be any more successful than the previous ones. However Motorola still have a powerful brand (in the US at least) and many talented engineers so it would be a mistake to write them off completely.

Published by Rafe Blandford at 10:37 UTC, October 31st

Categories: Developer, Industry
Platforms: General, UIQ 3

News Discussion

slitchfield
Comment: As I commented in the Insight podcast, I've been fed up with Motorola's fickleness for years. They caused the downfall of Psion with such a cancellation and they've been dipping into and out of other platforms with gay abandon ever since.

It's like having a girlfriend who simply can't make up her mind. I'd have ditched her years ago. Before she ditched me. Again.

Motorola deserves everything it gets for its attitude and lack of stickability in this decade.

Steve [personal thoughts only]
stuclark
Comment: The writing has been on the wall for some time really. First Moto cancelled "Skarven" (Z12) and now it seems "Texel" and "Ruby" are gone too. It's a great pity as Texel was pretty much ready for release (due Q4 08 / Q1 09) and Ruby was rumoured to be quite close too.
Unregistered
Comment: Finally a good decision from Motorola.
Raven
Comment: [quote=slitchfield;398044]As I commented in the Insight podcast, I've been fed up with Motorola's fickleness for years. They caused the downfall of Psion with such a cancellation and they've been dipping into and out of other platforms with gay abandon ever since.

It's like having a girlfriend who simply can't make up her mind. I'd have ditched her years ago. Before she ditched me. Again.

Motorola deserves everything it gets for its attitude and lack of stickability in this decade.

Steve [personal thoughts only][/quote]


Hear Hear! Couldn't agree more! Motorola and 'strategy'... - talk about oxymoron...
Unregistered
Comment: Since the critical mass for UIQ is going down, SonyErcisson will have to select S60, Android or WM as a replacement. For a lot of reasons including insider rumors, Android is probably the best bet.

I personally believe that Symbian is outdated since it doesn't offer anything like .NET CF. Android isn't there yet, but it is actually quite close.

Sincerely
Unregistered Poster
Dismaied Symbian developer, almost happy Android convert
Rafe
Comment: Sony Ericsson has chosen the Symbian Foundation (or S60 if you prefer). It expects to release its first handset in H2 2009. They said they look at Android (who wouldn't), but do not have any plans with it. They use Windows Mobile in the X1 (Xperia range) and I imagine there may be more of those (but its a high nice solution not an platform strategy choice).

Interesting comment on not having .NET CF - I agree to an extent - an abstracted programming layer / platform would be good. I would point out there are plenty of other options (Flash, WRT, Python, Open C etc. with more of the way) so I don't think this is the issue it used to be (when it was Symbian C++ or Java only).

I assume you know there's a working run time (currently CF v2, but v3.2 next year) from Red Five Labs.
ares
Comment: Rafe´s right. At SE devs support forum they even told devs to start looking at s60 v5 SDK, more clear than that is impossible...

Regarding Motorola...i agree with Steve...in fact i wrote i never believed Moto´s commitment to UIQ at uiqblog. Everything they did (not do) since they became UIQ shareholders is the proof. Its not only SE the responsible for UIQ´s death, the fact that Motorola was close to inactive only made things worse.
rbrunner
Comment: [quote]However Motorola still have ... many talented engineers[/quote]

Yeah, who after all those "strategies" are - confused? disillusioned? p*ssed off? ready to jump ship? scheduled for layoff, or at least fearing to be so?

Anything but ready to bring their talents to bloom, I would guess.
Unregistered
Comment: Who cares? They are no longer relevant, and will likely not even be in business in a year. They will never ship an Android phone either.
langdona
Comment: I have just never understood Motorola's inability to make a decision and stick by it. They should have decided on one (or possibly 2) OS's years ago and stuck with it. Instead they get 90% way through the development of something and drop it. Its probably because they were not good products (although the phone they developed with Psion looked good) so instead of blaming their design departments the design departments blame the OS and it gets dropped for the next OS which they also muck up the design for. Has Motorola ever produced a good smartphone using any platform? Its no wonder Motorola looks like a fading company.
Unregistered
Comment: No surprise about Symbian going away on Moto. They never did a proper job of selling that product. I'm surprised to see them kill their own Linux phones -- tremendously popular in Asia. But as usual Moto screwed up -- they can't do 3G. It is a shame.
Unregistered
Comment: I think Motorola may not be the last and only company to leave Symbian. SE may be the next one.
Unregistered
Comment: I think they are next to go as there is not real reason to use them as the choice is Symbian, Google or Microsoft. Motorola scrapping their linux platfrom is a kick in the teeth for LiMo.
Ilgaz
Comment: If I was a UIQ developer, I would tell both Motorola and Sony Ericsson "Don't let the door open after you" or something.

Motorola ownership was the PROBLEM of UIQ.

If people will see Motorola credible on Windows Mobile/Android scene with their current culture, good luck to them too.
Posyjeanine
Comment: Motorola set to use Windows Mobile and Android....Motorola's third quarter net loses were $397 million and its market share has continued to slide. It is now in fourth position for market share with around 7.7% of the market compared to second place and 20% just 2 years ago.....
The abandonment of Symbian UIQ is not surprising given that the advent of Symbian Foundation. However Motorola choosing Android over the Symbian Foundaion may raise a few eyebrows. It may be a question of timing, Android is available now, whereas the first release of the Symbian Foundation will not take place until H1 2009; moreover that release will be dominated by Nokia technology. It is likely that a lack of willingness, on the part of US based management, to work with Nokia and its partners in the Symbian Foundation is a contributory factor. In the end it was a choice between working with Nokia and working with a combination of Microsoft and Google. In both instances Motorola would have to rationalise taking a secondary role in directing the course of software strategy.
Anguished business politics have long been a part of Motorola's strategy decisions. Its platform strategy has a more complex history than any other handset manufacturer.

 

Main Navigation

» Home (1)
» News (2)
» Reviews (3)  
» Features (4)
» Media (5)
» Forums M | Full (6)
» Top (9)

Advert

no links available

mobile.allaboutsymbian.com