logo
All About Symbian - News
Nav (0)

Any colour smartphone you like, not just black

With the Symbian Foundation set to provide an open source smartphone OS, hardware partners with off the shelf components, and a huge amount of software ready to be placed into a smartphone, is the time right for the smaller companies to come back to Symbian? Ewan considers the potential rise of the boutique range of smartphones in 2010. Read on...

When you look at something that has been made by hand, compared to something made by a machine bolting together components, there is always an aesthetic difference... and the feeling of something being worthwhile. But a pair of shoes is (mostly) still a pair of shoes, and the functionality remains the same.

Once in a while you'll see us reporting on a press release that Symbian have paired up with a manufacturer of a component, be it a chip, screen, graphics technology, and suchlike. To the man in the street these aren't huge deals, but they are subtly changing how smartphones are made and constructed.

I hate to do this, but if you look back at the Psion Series 5 (which ran, in essence Symbian OS v1 through v5), the entire device, right down to the chips, were custom designed for the machine; this took time and money. And a lot of development. In the first Symbian smartphones, you could see the same custom trends.

But now, with components available for all areas of the smartphone off the shelf, and many of them having code 'hooks' inside Symbian OS, there is less of a need for these customised examples. You just line up the boxes, circuit boards, peripherals and cases from your local fabrication plant, chuck in the free OS from the Symbian Foundation, and away you go.

Lots of Nokias
Go on, you try and name them!

Of course it's not that easy, but in relative terms, building a smartphone is far easier than it was seven or eight years ago. While the technology that is available and is expected to be in a phone has ballooned through a mix of Moore's Law and attempts to find the next best thing, there is an air of standardisation about the baseline requirements.

One of the complaints about Symbian is that it is 'dominated by Nokia', and the raw numbers do bear that out (but hey, HTC dominate Windows Mobile, this isn't a black and white argument). This wasn't always the case, and if you cast your mind back to the early days of S60, when it was Series 60, alongside Nokia there were a number of projects from other manufacturers... I'm thinking of manufacturers like Motorola, Samsung, Panasonic, Sendo and Sony Ericsson.


Phones could look like anything in the future.

Symbian OS did not have huge sales in those days, and the devices from the smaller manufacturers struggled to get market recognition and share, and ultimately they did not sell enough to recoup the investment and ongoing costs of many of the companies. Given that we now have a much more mature market that more easily accepts smartphones, and a certain simplification of the manufacturing and design process thanks to the Symbian Foundation and the various partners, is the time right again for a range of smaller manufacturers to return to Symbian and start a boutique industry of smartphone design?

With a more open community to help support the device, off the shelf components and a number of factories, predominantly in the Far East, offering relatively low production costs, I wonder if the eco-system is now at the point where the mass-market-produced devices have opened up a space where a small group of people could head out and make run of smartphones, say 100-200,000 units, aimed at a niche market, and make a small but efficient business?

Isn't that essentially what Sendo were doing, just a few years too early? When you look back at the buzz around the Sendo X1 in terms of specifications it was miles ahead of the then front runners, the Nokia 7650, 3650 and 6600, with a candybar design, standard number keypad, stereo sound, heavily customisable home screen, and improved camera (with a flash!). Plans were put in place for the X2, with a strong focus on music, some six months before the Sony Walkman range of phones was announced. Unfortunately Sendo went into receivership before the X2 hit the streets.

Sendo X Sendo X
Gone, forgotten but ready for a revivial?

Would the story of Sendo be any different if it happened today? I think so, for all the reasons above. And one other area. Marketing the device to the power-users would be much easier as the internet, blogs and news sites could be leveraged. Sendo did this with the X1 and X2 but the impact today would be far greater in terms of eyeballs and impact. And the internet could have provided an easy route for people to buy the device no matter where they are in the world – the need for acceptance by a carrier is diminished when you are talking to people happy to spend a few hundred pounds on unlocked smartphones for their own use.

The Symbian Foundation still needs to make everything available, and that's going to take a little bit longer, maybe a year, but that's enough time for the other elements required to be put in place by the partners. Hopefully we'll see a lot more manufacturers start up in the smartphone world and look at Symbian as the basis for their device. And what a wonderful world that would be.

-- Ewan Spence. July 2009.

Published by Ewan Spence at 9:11 UTC, July 3rd

Categories: Editorial Thoughts
Platforms: General

News Discussion

eletrix
Comment: Symbian at the basis of their phone ?

Sorry but at the moment i wasn't aware that the Symbian Foundation has made at least an initially release ?!?!?

I really hope they deliver a functional and efficient OS.mature strong and flexible.and please God deliver a better more flexible SDK.
It's useless to release an OS without an SDK.with only symbian native application.

At the moment the only OS to appeal Sendo and other manufactures (and users ) is google OS.

(Even though i think symbian has more potential)
Unregistered
Comment: A considerable factor in Sendo's demise was Microsoft and their (I regret to say) totally typical evil behaviour which saw Sendo sue them in a cut and dried case. It is heartening to see MS' comeuppance these days with Windows Mobile in an increasing decline, and deservedly so.

Yes, I'm all for more flavours of Symbian powered phones. There seems to be a blind and wierdly misplaced enthusiasm for Android (rather than Symbian) these days in a myriad of new phones, largely by ignorant people being caught up in pure hype and hot air.

Having written a professional study of Android and it's SDK, I can say it is technically a pretty good OS and attractive at face value. However, that's about it. In other respects it is weak - underlying tech problems, an app store that generates practically no money for developers and so is largely a failure, very poor hardware (the G1? - Ha!), tiny userbase, and so on and so on. Hyped up new innovations in Android (and iPhone for that matter) are almost always not only already present in Symbian/S60 but indeed in many cases old hat.

If a multitude of manufacturers want the most powerful, mature, stable, reliable, robust and exciting phone OS out there, with what will surely become the biggest and most rewarding app store, they need only choose Symbian. Of course if these company's CTO's decide to lead them the Android route then they must face the consequences.
Ewan
Comment: Electrix, the article says that Symbian OS as open source is in the future, at some point enxt year i would think. So there is time to put all the other elemetns for hardware and softare apps in place. I'd love to see this happen.

And yes Sendo had other issues in terms of partners, but does that explain away Siemens and Panasonic leaving? I think Sendo was a classic right idea t the wrong time - a low run, high spec, desirable to power users smartphone.
svdwal
Comment: I don't think it will be easy to create smartphones in such low volumes and still make a profit. To differentiate, a company can either compete on price or on features.

Competing on price means that you must shift a lot of devices to make any kind of money, which rules out a small company making a couple of 100.000's of devices.

Competing on features looks more promising, as you might be able to sell those at a premium. These features can be either non-programmable, like diamond-crusted gold-plated casings and suchlike, or things that programs can interact with (GPS, magnetic compass, heart rate monitor, blood sugar level tester). Things that programs can interact with have the disadvantage that they need programmer talent to write drivers and API's for.

But who knows. I would certainly be in the market for a proper Communicator-like device with a decent keyboard and a big screen, and some tweaks to S60 and/or Qt to make it work properly with shortcuts.
mCrem
Comment: ewan, can you post a high res photo of that first pic? It brings back so much memories.. thanks :)
TheSpecialBoy
Comment: i think these days we must return to basics...Not the x86 language, but to the basic of business.

with today many new alternatives and new options for small or big hardware developers, Symbian (foundation or whatever name might come) should keep it simple and have bright future....

I might have a wrong vision, but I see many future phones operating on many diferent open source Software options, including symbian....

As long as smartphone producers give enough hardware resources ...they can squeeze symbian in and sell a phone with good software.

i don`t see in the future of phones more than 3 up to 5 players.

because these 3 players can offer also low end performance but can comply also with smartphone user requirements for developments.
Unregistered
Comment: Some may argue but the initial success of the symbian foundation's os is heavily dependent on how much it matches the current capabilities of series 60 (3rd edition). Case in point: kde 4 and amarok. These two (and myriad other kde apps) lost quite a substantial userbase when they were reinvented from smart brunette heels to rather dumb but beautiful blondes (no offense to blondes meant, really). Yes, they're getting back on track but the symbian foundation may not have that chance.
stuclark
Comment: I can post you a high res picture of the 4 (yes, FOUR) Sendo smartphones if you wish... and I'll take it on the current best of the crop ;)

(and yes, I know Rafe, Ewan & Steve have just been waiting for me to comment on this one)
morpheus2702
Comment: To quote The Thick Of It: [I]"Is Davina MCall the new pope and can we download rice yet? That's all I've been waiting for."[/I]

In that world sure, along with downloading rice not only is there a [I]vast[/I] range of handcrafted, bespoke Symbian handsets produced by a flourishing cottage industry, you can also [I]grow your own phone[/I] with newly available 'Symbian seeds' available at garden centres everywhere.

Upon returning to reality however, simply any 'boutique' phone beyond the stratospheric realms of Vertu and overblinged Motorola monstronsities just ain't gonna happen. If Sendo couldn't make it work back in 2005/6 back when the economy was relatively bouyant, why on earth would it work in 2009/10?

Saying that components are available off the shelf at relatively low cost from FE suppliers is utter bo***cks. Sure they are if you are the size of Nokia and say 'we'll schedule an order for, say, 5 million of this component this year.' But do you think that the Boutique Cottage Phone Company (BCPC), unheard of, with little or no credit history, placing their order for 100-200k pcs will get anywhere near the same price as Nokia would? Of course they won't - they'll be paying around 40% more, deposit up front, balance on shipping... compared to Nokia who will be paying the balance at least 120 days after shipment!

End result, BCPC is already at a price and cash flow disadvantage before they've even begun to differientiate their product. The differientiation compared to the baseline Nokia product is going to have to be [I]really[/I] cheap to implement and/or [I]really[/I] add value to the product in order to justify the premium that BCPC would have to charge.


Me - I'd invest in the Symbian Seeds...

 

Main Navigation

» Home (1)
» News (2)
» Reviews (3)  
» Features (4)
» Media (5)
» Forums M | Full (6)
» Top (9)

Advert

mobile.allaboutsymbian.com